The Last of Us Part I' directors explain why the game stayed so true to the original

Aside from whether The Last of Us Part I is worth the $70 asking price, the question surrounding this remake is how much the original 2013 game was going to change. Would developer Naughty Dog treat this as a total do-over, changing the level design, gameplay mechanics and player upgrades? It has become obvious over the last few weeks, as Sony released a handful of preview videos, that that wouldn’t be the case. Instead, the game directors told Engadget that the goal was to bring massively updated visuals and a host of quality-of-life improvements to a game that would otherwise stay true to its roots.

Jennifer Lawrence: “I Didn't Have a Life. I Thought I Should Go

The Last of Us Part II Director's Cut: Kojima's Statement

HBO's 'The Last of Us' adaptation is a milestone for LGBTQ gamers

Last of Us' creators explain Cordyceps mushroom zombies, changing

The Last of Us may have broken the cardinal rule of video game

The Last Of Us Part I's PC Launch Pushed To Late March - Game Informer

The Last of Us review: True to the game, and just as hard-hitting

Please someone explain? Wanted to play Tlou but I'm very confused

Characters of The Last of Us Part II - Wikipedia

The Case Against the Trauma Plot

The Last of Us Part 1 Review