PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

This paper compares the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64- bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. The principal goal guiding the design of any encryption algorithm must be security. In the real world, however, performance and implementation cost are always of concern. Making the assumption that the major AES candidates are secure (a big assumption, to be sure, but one that is best dealt with in another paper), the most important properties the algorithms will be judged on will be the performance and cost of implementation. In this paper, we will completely ignore security. Instead, we will compare the performance of the leading AES candidates on a variety of common platforms: 32-bit CPUs, 64-bit CPUs, cheap 8-bit smart-card CPUs, and dedicated hardware. For each platform, we first make some general observations on the performance issues for each of the platforms, then compare the various AES candidates, and finally look at the specific issues for each of the candidates.

Do blind people hear better?: Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Performance analysis of AES, DES and Blowfish cryptographic

DES, AES and Blowfish: Symmetric Key Cryptography Algorithms

Applied Sciences, Free Full-Text

Performance Analysis of Enhanced AES-128 and Blowfish Algorithms

A Performance Comparison of Data Encryption Algorithms

PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

PDF] Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

Performance analysis of AES, DES and Blowfish cryptographic

PDF) Evaluating the performance of Symmetric Key Algorithms: AES

Electronics, Free Full-Text

PDF] Investigating the Effects of varying the Key Size on the

GROMACS and LUMI Supercomputer Transform Molecular Dynamics

PDF) Performance Comparison of the AES Submissions

Encryption technique based on chaotic neural network space shift